<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey says&#8230;more dining experience details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.menuism.com/2006/10/22/survey-saysmore-dining-experience-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.menuism.com/2006/10/22/survey-saysmore-dining-experience-details/</link>
	<description>post-eating reading.  dining etiquette, know-how and anything else tasty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: menuism</title>
		<link>http://blog.menuism.com/2006/10/22/survey-saysmore-dining-experience-details/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>menuism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menuism.wordpress.com/2006/10/22/survey-saysmore-dining-experience-details/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d probably choose &quot;fun with friends&quot; for the situation you&#039;re mentioning, though depending on the setting I could also see &quot;business meeting&quot; or &quot;a meal to go&quot; being applicable.  It&#039;s really up to you as the reviewer to apply what you think is the best label for the situation.  That&#039;s why we show the majority vote for each category - because there&#039;s no one &quot;right&quot; answer for any given restaurant.

Hope that helps. =)

-John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d probably choose &#8220;fun with friends&#8221; for the situation you&#8217;re mentioning, though depending on the setting I could also see &#8220;business meeting&#8221; or &#8220;a meal to go&#8221; being applicable.  It&#8217;s really up to you as the reviewer to apply what you think is the best label for the situation.  That&#8217;s why we show the majority vote for each category &#8211; because there&#8217;s no one &#8220;right&#8221; answer for any given restaurant.</p>
<p>Hope that helps. =)</p>
<p>-John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluerhapsodies</title>
		<link>http://blog.menuism.com/2006/10/22/survey-saysmore-dining-experience-details/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>bluerhapsodies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menuism.wordpress.com/2006/10/22/survey-saysmore-dining-experience-details/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Cost and Service are cool but the Ambience category is interesting - just coz i went for a romantic dinner or had a meal with my entire extended family wouldn&#039;t necessarily mean the place is great for a romantic dinner or for families. But i guess we can always put that as a caveat in our review?

Also, I often catch up with just 1 friend/coworker over a meal... it&#039;s neither a &quot;romantic date&quot; nor &quot;fun with friends&quot;. What&#039;s the best category for that? It&#039;s more like small-group casual dining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost and Service are cool but the Ambience category is interesting &#8211; just coz i went for a romantic dinner or had a meal with my entire extended family wouldn&#8217;t necessarily mean the place is great for a romantic dinner or for families. But i guess we can always put that as a caveat in our review?</p>
<p>Also, I often catch up with just 1 friend/coworker over a meal&#8230; it&#8217;s neither a &#8220;romantic date&#8221; nor &#8220;fun with friends&#8221;. What&#8217;s the best category for that? It&#8217;s more like small-group casual dining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
